Well, by law
the only way our community can continue to get almost $17,000,000 of federal
funding for housing programs for those experiencing homelessness, is if MDHA
continues to exist, nay thrive. And, the federal government foots that very
large $17,000,000 bill for those housing programs, but expects the community
(that’s you and me!) to fund the much smaller cost of mechanism for getting it,
MDHA. Beyond that, just look at what MDHA has accomplished with its partners, a
65% reduction in chronic homelessness, a 1200% increase in permanent supportive
housing (PSH - 2000 units now!), and a public investment by DHA in housing 3400
formerly homeless individuals and families at an annual value of $28,000,000,
and much much more. And, you know what? You ain’t seen nothing yet. We will add
another 1800 units of PSH, and we will end chronic homelessness by the end of
2016; you just wait and see. That is why you should give to MDHA.
Just click here
on September 18, 2014: https://northtexasgivingday.org/#npo/metro-dallas-homeless-alliance
or here the
other 364 days of the year:
http://www.mdhadallas.org/donate/
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Defending a Basic Right by Charles Gulley, Vice President of Programs, MDHA
It is unfortunate that time must be spent defending a basic right that
belongs to all human beings in the free world, i.e. the right to live where one
wishes to live. In Frisco, there are those who believe that developing
restrictive covenants or deed restrictions provide protective immunity to
practices of institutional classism, making the bold assumption that persons
from lower socio-economic strata would lower property values.
This past week, the Dallas Morning News released the 2014 Point-in-Time Homeless Census Count that shows a trend of increasing homelessness among families, women with children, and youth. Several studies over the past decade and a half have shown theDallas area lacking
affordable housing for low-income households. The lack of affordable housing,
coupled with those who would restrict where persons could live, only
exacerbates the problem of homelessness. Unless preventative measures are taken
like those being exercised by City House, i.e. housing the homeless to improve
persons lives, homeless numbers are bound to grow. If HOAs and other
communities can deed restrict communities and deed restrict the use of those
properties to keep certain groups out, where are people supposed to live? Where
will families and young adults live who need to stabilize their living
conditions to improve their lives?
The disregard of inalienable rights of human beings being subordinated to the maintenance of property values cast a dark shadow on the HOA and Frisco, leaving way to charges of societal prejudice and class discrimination. Fair housing laws must be invoked to protect the rights of those who only want a place to live. There is no evidence that City House’s action of moving into the Frisco neighborhood has negatively impacted any property values.
Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance stands in support of City House’s right to own and occupy a house in that Frisco neighborhood and any neighborhood of their choice. With increasing homelessness among certain groups and a short supply of affordable housing, restricting where people can live just to protect property values is, first and foremost, humanely wrong. Second, it is not good for theDallas
area if we want to stop homelessness and assist persons to become productive
citizens. The legal action being taken by the HOA will only hurt the region’s
image and the region’s attempt to overcome homelessness, poverty, and other
associated societal problems.
This past week, the Dallas Morning News released the 2014 Point-in-Time Homeless Census Count that shows a trend of increasing homelessness among families, women with children, and youth. Several studies over the past decade and a half have shown the
The disregard of inalienable rights of human beings being subordinated to the maintenance of property values cast a dark shadow on the HOA and Frisco, leaving way to charges of societal prejudice and class discrimination. Fair housing laws must be invoked to protect the rights of those who only want a place to live. There is no evidence that City House’s action of moving into the Frisco neighborhood has negatively impacted any property values.
Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance stands in support of City House’s right to own and occupy a house in that Frisco neighborhood and any neighborhood of their choice. With increasing homelessness among certain groups and a short supply of affordable housing, restricting where people can live just to protect property values is, first and foremost, humanely wrong. Second, it is not good for the
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
The "Pattonization" of American Life
One of the most
fascinating movies ever made is “Patton”. I recently rewatched it, and though
the style is a little different than what we are used to today, for the most
part it holds up, especially the tour de force performance of George C. Scott.
The movie gives a very objective picture of the general, as one of those
responsible for the Allied victory in Europe ,
but also as a greatly flawed man, who himself vacillates between dreams of
greatness and awareness of his shortcomings.
The film begins with Patton facing an audience of soldiers, who we never see only hear, as the camera gives a POV shot of the general speaking to the audience. If all you did was watch that speech, you would get the essence of the movie and of Patton, the man. It strikes me, as an American who grew up abroad, and at times looks atAmerica ’s character as an outsider, that you get
the essence of America ’s
internal struggle with itself from that very speech, and that that speech and
Patton himself is a stand in for America writ large.
One of the most central points in both the speech and the movie, is Patton’s contention that “all real Americans love to fight,” and that we “love a winner,” and “abhor a loser.” It is clear and explicit that he believes that this is true in all instances, at peace or at war. General Omar Bradley, tells him that the difference between them is that while he, Bradley, does what he does because he was trained and he is good at it, Patton does it because he loves war. What we see in the film is that because of this approach, Patton is the perfect blunt instrument in the careful hands of his commanders on the battlefield, but an utter failure in almost every other situation.
Why is this? Why is Patton’s approach so patently wrong? Simply put, it is because except if you are fighting fascism (where ironically war is the lifeblood of society), you really don’t want to “fight”. You really don’t want there to be a winner and a loser. What you really want is to create as many win-win situations for everyone. That is what leads to success and happiness for as many people as possible, which should be the purpose of a democratic civilized society.
What we see today, as opposed to the war and post war period, is that all too often Patton’s erroneous approach is put into practice in our society, particularly in the economic realm. The examples are all around us. Corporate tycoons paying a smaller percentage of their income in taxes than their workers do; companies never getting off the dole, while the social safety net is gradually shredded; a small percentage of our population controlling more and more of the wealth, while on the opposite end of the spectrum poverty grows, and with it another generation laid to waste.
Patton’s old commander, Eisenhower, warned us in his parting words to the nation to beware the military-industrial complex. He told that if we did not pay attention, this faceless menace would overpower us. In fact, much worse has happened, we have adopted a military thinking, that tells us that if others don’t lose, we have not really won. We can do better. We must.
The film begins with Patton facing an audience of soldiers, who we never see only hear, as the camera gives a POV shot of the general speaking to the audience. If all you did was watch that speech, you would get the essence of the movie and of Patton, the man. It strikes me, as an American who grew up abroad, and at times looks at
One of the most central points in both the speech and the movie, is Patton’s contention that “all real Americans love to fight,” and that we “love a winner,” and “abhor a loser.” It is clear and explicit that he believes that this is true in all instances, at peace or at war. General Omar Bradley, tells him that the difference between them is that while he, Bradley, does what he does because he was trained and he is good at it, Patton does it because he loves war. What we see in the film is that because of this approach, Patton is the perfect blunt instrument in the careful hands of his commanders on the battlefield, but an utter failure in almost every other situation.
Why is this? Why is Patton’s approach so patently wrong? Simply put, it is because except if you are fighting fascism (where ironically war is the lifeblood of society), you really don’t want to “fight”. You really don’t want there to be a winner and a loser. What you really want is to create as many win-win situations for everyone. That is what leads to success and happiness for as many people as possible, which should be the purpose of a democratic civilized society.
What we see today, as opposed to the war and post war period, is that all too often Patton’s erroneous approach is put into practice in our society, particularly in the economic realm. The examples are all around us. Corporate tycoons paying a smaller percentage of their income in taxes than their workers do; companies never getting off the dole, while the social safety net is gradually shredded; a small percentage of our population controlling more and more of the wealth, while on the opposite end of the spectrum poverty grows, and with it another generation laid to waste.
Patton’s old commander, Eisenhower, warned us in his parting words to the nation to beware the military-industrial complex. He told that if we did not pay attention, this faceless menace would overpower us. In fact, much worse has happened, we have adopted a military thinking, that tells us that if others don’t lose, we have not really won. We can do better. We must.
Monday, September 8, 2014
How About You Pick on Someone Your Own Size?!
Remember when you were a kid, and a bully picked on a kid
much younger than him? You probably said in an indignant voice, "Hey! How
about you pick on someone your own size?" That is what I (David Gruber)
want to say to a few of my fellow Frisco residents in this infuriating story
from the Dallas Morning News about a homeowners association in Frisco suing our
partner, City House: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/frisco/headlines/20140905-suit-seeks-to-block-homeless-youths-from-frisco-neighborhood.ece
One of the wonderful programs City House has is a housing
programs for teens and young adults, experiencing homelessness. These single
gender groups live together, learn valuable life skills, and learn or work in
the community, all under the supervision of a trained adult, who lives with
them. They have been running this program in Plano , with nary a negative comment, for
years now.
They identified a need for this program in Frisco too, and
have already put in a lot of time and money into opening such a home in Frisco
for young women. Now, instead of moving the young women into the home, they
must contend with a lawsuit from the homeowners association, where the home is
located, who seek to block them from moving the young women in. Fortunately,
MDHA Corporate Champion, Strasburger & Price, has stepped up to the plate,
and is representing them. We, at MDHA, wish City House and Strasburger &
Price the best of luck in defeating this lawsuit.
Saturday, September 6, 2014
76 Fewer Homeless Veterans in Dallas!
Paula Maroney –
DHA and the VA issued VASH (Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing) vouchers to 76 homeless veterans yesterday! Thanks to theVeterans Resource Center
for staying open after normal business hours to accommodate the number who
attended the event. Plans are to repeat the event on September 18 in order to
reach the goal of issuing 100 vouchers this month. Also, a big thanks goes to
CitySquare for providing lunch yesterday to the veterans waiting to meet with
case workers. This is an example of the Continuum of Care working together to
end veterans’ homelessness in 2015!
DHA and the VA issued VASH (Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing) vouchers to 76 homeless veterans yesterday! Thanks to the
Thursday, September 4, 2014
DHA and the VA Partner to House Vets Experiencing Homelessness
Monday, September 1, 2014
Annual Census Highlights Dallas’s Successes and Challenges in the Fight to End Homelessness
Successes
Dallas , Texas - The report on the 2014
federally mandated Point-In-Time Homeless Count and Census,
conducted by the Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance (MDHA), highlights a number of
figures that give Mike Faenza, MDHA’s President and CEO, great satisfaction.
“Since 2005, we, in Dallas , have decreased
chronic homelessness by 65%, and the number of people sleeping outdoors by
about 50%,” said Faenza , in an exclusive interview with
the Dallas Morning News. The
federal government defines persons who have been homeless for a year and have a
disability, as chronically homeless. “We accomplished this through increasing
permanent supportive housing (PSH) units by 1200% to over 2000 units in that
same time frame,” Faenza said, “PSH works, and through this evidence based solution,
we will end chronic homelessness here in Dallas.”
MDHA
MDHA, perhaps most well-known for launching and operating The Bridge, a $28 million homeless intake center in Dallas, before spinning it off as a separate non-profit at the end of 2011, is an alliance of non-profit organizations devoted to ending homelessness in Dallas and Collin Counties. It facilitates about $17,000,000 of annual federal funding, coordinates services and through the use of a sophisticated software system, drives improvement in more than 45 different housing programs, run by over 20 different non-profit and local government grantees. Its momentum is felt well beyond these specific programs. “Due to our partnership with MDHA, we prioritized the housing of those experiencing homelessness, and have so far housed more than 3400 formerly homeless individuals and families,” said MaryAnn Russ, President and CEO of the Dallas Housing Authority and a MDHA board member. “In monetary terms, with an average rent of $700 per month, our investment tops $28,000,000 annually. This would not be happening, if not forFaenza
and MDHA’s forward thinking.”
The Count
Every year, across the nation, at the end of January, organizations like MDHA count the people experiencing homelessness in each and every community. Here inDallas , partner agencies and MDHA grantees count guests
and residents in shelters and housing sites, while more than 200 community
volunteers, with the help of Dallas
police officers locate and count those living outdoors. Similar counts are
conducted by the Collin County Homeless Coalition and by the cities of Garland , Irving and Mesquite . The cost of
this huge operation in Dallas
is subsidized by the Real Estate Council Foundation.
The Data
Those experiencing homelessness are asked to fill out surveys to gather important information to help assess their needs, and better serve them. This information complements data MDHA gathers and analyzes all year round from each federally funded homeless program, through a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). Each provider, as well as the continuum as a whole receives a monthly letter grade, based on this data. This system has allowed MDHA to improve PSH services by over 30% in just two years.
Challenges
Britton Banowsky, Commissioner of ConferenceUSA , and Chair of the MDHA board,
is cautiously optimistic, but mindful of the challenges ahead, “Our goal is
simple. We want to find an adequate housing solution for all homeless people in
our community. We continue to make great progress, but we have a long way to go
and need everyone's help to get there.” The report echoes Banowsky’s note of
caution, and emphasizes a number of trends, which come as no surprise to MDHA
staff, including an increase in the total number of people experiencing
homelessness, including families with children, and an unacceptably high number
of veterans experiencing homelessness. MDHA works with a number of programs
that specifically target families and veterans, and in 2015 will begin
facilitating funding for some Rapid Rehousing programs. Rapid Re-Housing
programs are designed to quickly re-house those families and individuals about
to experience homelessness, or who have recently begun to experience
homelessness, before the effects resulting from homelessness can negatively
impact them.
Faenza emphasizes that the fight against
homelessness is just a piece of the puzzle. “Dallas still has some of the highest poverty
rates in the country, affordable housing is scarce, and the mental health
provider reimbursement system is dismally underfunded. We firmly believe we can
lower the rate of chronic homelessness to zero, but that will not make these
larger problems go away.”
Strategic Stewardship
As the steward of the largest source of funding for those experiencing homelessness inDallas , MDHA is strategic and frugal regarding
the funds it brings to Dallas and Collin Counties .
“Carefully spending federal money on evidence-based programs is ultimately
better for everyone, including the American taxpayer,” said David Gruber,
MDHA’s Development Manager, “Obviously, this is a moral issue, first and
foremost. However, if you are concerned about government spending, you will
want to support these programs even more. Research shows that the most
cost-effective solution to homelessness is putting people back into homes, and
that leads to less, not more, government spending.” MDHA intends to add another
1800 PSH units by the end of 2016, and through that end chronic homelessness in
Dallas and Collin Counties .
MDHA
MDHA, perhaps most well-known for launching and operating The Bridge, a $28 million homeless intake center in Dallas, before spinning it off as a separate non-profit at the end of 2011, is an alliance of non-profit organizations devoted to ending homelessness in Dallas and Collin Counties. It facilitates about $17,000,000 of annual federal funding, coordinates services and through the use of a sophisticated software system, drives improvement in more than 45 different housing programs, run by over 20 different non-profit and local government grantees. Its momentum is felt well beyond these specific programs. “Due to our partnership with MDHA, we prioritized the housing of those experiencing homelessness, and have so far housed more than 3400 formerly homeless individuals and families,” said MaryAnn Russ, President and CEO of the Dallas Housing Authority and a MDHA board member. “In monetary terms, with an average rent of $700 per month, our investment tops $28,000,000 annually. This would not be happening, if not for
The Count
Every year, across the nation, at the end of January, organizations like MDHA count the people experiencing homelessness in each and every community. Here in
The Data
Those experiencing homelessness are asked to fill out surveys to gather important information to help assess their needs, and better serve them. This information complements data MDHA gathers and analyzes all year round from each federally funded homeless program, through a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). Each provider, as well as the continuum as a whole receives a monthly letter grade, based on this data. This system has allowed MDHA to improve PSH services by over 30% in just two years.
Challenges
Britton Banowsky, Commissioner of Conference
Strategic Stewardship
As the steward of the largest source of funding for those experiencing homelessness in